Showing posts with label Scott Brown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scott Brown. Show all posts

Monday, February 21, 2011

Scott Brown: 'That Life Made Me the Man I Am Today'

Some people have asked what I don't like about certain elements of the Tea Party such as the Tea Party Express (TPE). Scott Brown is a perfect example along with Olympia Snowe of their short sightedness. They see everything as liberal versus 'true' conservative -- it is not always that way. Massachusetts and Maine are not two Conservative Republican states but this group has the capability of costing us two Senate seats with their tactics if they come into MA like they did Alaska.

Both Scott and Snowe should talk to Lisa Murkowski about the Tea Party Express and their underhanded tactics. Truth means nothing to that group and are a blight on the legitimate Tea Party people. TPE is all about getting people to donate for their choice of who is the best candidate when they don't even live in the State. Our Country Deserves Better PAC is who gets the donations not the Tea Party Express. Don't understand how the Our Country Deserves Better PAC could fund the Tea Party Express because they are nothing like TPE which frankly is out of control and has been almost since it was formed.

They were big time behind Joe Miller who turned out to be a horrible candidate who never could keep a job and broke rules wherever he landed, then Christine O'Donnell of "I am not a witch fame" while wearing a black dress, Sharron Angle who ran one of the worst campaigns ever in NV and refused to listen to long time strategist, and John Raese in WV who keeps running and losing and spends over half his time in Florida. We probably lost the Senate race in Colorado because Ken Buck who should have won could not lose the Tea Party label when trying to say he was a grassroots candidate to bring in the independent votes. He was right he was a Colorado grassroots candidate but the media kept calling him the Tea Party candidate.

Some people from the TPE want to kick out the grassroots of the Republican Party but we are not leaving and will continue to support candidates who can WIN like Scott Brown and Olympia Snowe who vote with us most of the time on the very important issues. Both are very much on board with the military. The Don't Ask Don't Tell was going to be overturned sooner or later and to use that as a wedge issue is stupid.

We support Scott Brown and Olympia Snowe for reelection in 2012 and hope the Tea Party Express finds out that they are not calling the shots in individual states. In fact I hope the American people wake up to their underhanded tactics they used in places like Alaska in 2010 along with their arrogance and quit contributing to their PAC.

We applaud Scott Brown for having the courage to write this book. Don't remember hearing of child abuse cases when I was growing up but over the years more and more has come out as people are no longer afraid to talk about abuse. IMHO, adults who abuse children should be thrown in jail and have the key thrown away. Brown uses nothing for an excuse but talks about how it made him a better person -- how refreshing not to play the victim act.

If I lived in Massachusetts, Scott Brown would definitely have my vote!

Scott Brown: 'That Life Made Me the Man I Am Today'
Feb 21, 2011 – 11:01 AM
Michele McPhee

Sen. Scott Brown gave the first copy of his memoir, "Against All Odds," to his mother, Judith, weeks before news broke that he was sexually abused as a child by a camp counselor, the Massachusetts Republican told AOL News.

It was also the first time his mother would learn about the physical attacks allegedly inflicted on him by her husbands -- childhood traumas he had never shared with anyone.

"I told her, 'I think you need to read this, Mom.' I gave a copy to my sister [Leeann], and she tried to get her to read it too,'' Brown said. "She didn't. She was dealing with some health issues, and I'm not sure she wanted to really know what was in it. It's a difficult process now, but I don't regret writing the book."



                                                                        Josh Reynolds AP
U.S. Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts says he
has no  regrets about revealing that he was
sexually abused by a camp counselor  as a child.


 Brown said his mother still hasn't read the book, but they've spoken and she told him she's proud of him.

He wrote the book, which hit bookstores today, because "I want people to understand where I came from; why I have voted the way I have voted," he said.

Brown stunned the nation last January when he won a special election for the Senate seat that had been held by Edward M. "Ted" Kennedy for decades -- a startling result in a state that had not elected a Republican since 1972. Kennedy had represented Massachusetts in Congress for 47 years before he died of cancer in 2009.

The memoir details Brown's hardscrabble upbringing in the blue-collar suburbs outside of Boston. It starts with a look at his tumultuous childhood, which was marred by violence against him and his mother, and the poverty that forced him at times to steal food.

"By the time I turned 18, I had moved 17 times and lived in 12 different homes," he wrote. The homes belonged to "relatives and whatever man my mother was married to at the time. We were visitors there; they were never our own."

Brown's mother was married four times. ''Constrained by her choices, good and bad, my mother worked hard, often at multiple jobs, to keep a roof over us, put clothes on our backs, and pay baby sitters, and she bought food and a few extras with whatever was left over," he wrote.

His father was an unfamiliar entity in his life, gone before Brown was a year old. He would materialize only on "rare weekends,'' the senator wrote.

The sexual abuse Brown describes allegedly happened the summer after he finished the fourth grade, when the 10-year-old was sent to a Christian camp on Cape Cod. While he will not name his alleged abuser and said he will not seek prosecution against the man, Brown can recall everything about the assault.

"I can remember how he looked, every inch of him: his long, sandy, light brown hair; his long, full mustache; the beads he wore; the tie-dyed T-shirts and the cutoff jeans, which gave him the look of a hippie,'' Brown wrote. "I was standing there with my pants down, and he came right up next to me and asked me if I needed help, and then he reached out his hand."

What happened next was an account of a brutal fondling that ended only when Brown screamed. He didn't tell a soul because his abuser said, "If you tell anybody, I will kill you."

It was a threat Brown took seriously, citing the incident as one of the reasons he was such a strong proponent of victims' rights in the Massachusetts State House.

"When I am attacked for some of my votes, for not voting in lockstep with the Republican Party, there are reasons for it,'' Brown told AOL News. "I hope these revelations will bring a better understanding to some of the fights I have waged as a legislator."

The alleged childhood abuse is a small part of "Against All Odds." The book describes the life experiences that shaped a politician whose unexpected win was described by his voters as "the Scott heard around the world."

It describes a troubled teenager who was arrested for shoplifting and chastised by a judge who told him to write an essay and concentrate on his athleticism -- advice he heeded. It also explains some of the decisions Brown made as he mounted his political career and some of the obstacles that provided unexpected direction.

Brown joined the National Guard because in the Blizzard of 1978 he saw it as the only organization not helpless in the face of that infamous storm. His prowess on the basketball court got him into college.

After graduating from Tufts University, he found a way to pay for law school by modeling, including a nude spread in Cosmopolitan that earned him the title "America's Sexiest Man.'' He's grateful for that job, he said, because it helped him meet his wife, Gail Huff, a former Boston television reporter. The couple raised two daughters -- Ayla, a former "American Idol" contestant who remains a celebrated singer, and Arianna, who is in medical school.

Looking ahead, Massachusetts Democrats have been very careful about picking a candidate to run against Brown in 2012. The senator hopes to raise $25 million for his re-election bid, which he knows will be more problematic because hard-line tea party activists have taken umbrage at a number of his more moderate votes, including his support of repeal for the military's don't ask, don't tell policy for homosexuals.

Sponsored LinksHe said he doesn't regret a single thing.

"I look back on my life now, though, and I can honestly say that there isn't one thing I would change -- not the arrest, not the violence, not the hunger, not the beatings and the brute struggles, not even cleaning up someone else's vomit in the stairwell of my dorm at Tufts for $10 in quick cash from the resident adviser because I had no money for extra food,'' Brown wrote.

"I wouldn't change any of it. ... Those years and that life made me the man I am today."

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Sen. Scott Brown writes off finance-reform bill


Now we learn that in the Conference Committee the House represented by Rep Frank (D-MA) was able to add a $19 billion bank tax to the bill. Where was Sen Dodd (D-CT)when this happened? Obviously he didn't object too much as it ended up in the Conference Committee bill.

The letter that Sen Scott Brown (R-MA) sent explains his stance on this bill:

In a letter to U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Newton), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), head of the Senate banking committee, Brown said a similar tax wasn’t in the bill he voted for in the Senate last month.

“I am writing you to express my strong opposition to the $19 billion bank tax that was included in the financial reform bill during the conference committee,” Brown wrote in his letter. “This tax was not in the Senate version of the bill, which I supported. If the final version of this bill contains these higher taxes, I will not support it.”
We applaud Scott Brown for standing up to Senator Dodd and the others in the Senate who agree with the addition of the $19B tax. Scott Brown is a breath of fresh air from Massachusetts who actually opposes no new taxes.

Sen. Scott Brown writes off finance-reform bill

By Jay Fitzgerald
Tuesday, June 29, 2010

U.S. Sen. Scott Brown vowed today he won’t vote for the massive financial-reform package unless a proposed $19 billion bank tax is yanked out of it.

Brown, who last month provided a key vote that allowed a similar reform bill to get out of the Senate, said he simply can’t support a tax increase that might be passed along to consumers.

(snip)

Last week, Brown angrily lashed out at the $19 billion tax, after it was unveiled by conference-committee negotiators. But he stopped short of saying he’d oppose the bill.

Today, he bluntly made his stand clear: No support if the tax remains.

Source: Boston Herald

Saturday, May 8, 2010

I Need Your Support -- Scott Brown on Earmarks

We can thank the people of Massachusetts for sending Scott Brown to the Senate to join Senators Coburn and McCain to fight earmarks. What a breath of fresh air from the State of Massachusetts in the Senate. Please sign his petitition to have a one year moratorium on earmarks which we hope with a Republican Senate will be permanent.
7 Feb 2010
I Need Your Support

Friend,

I wanted to give you this quick update about what is happening in Washington. I wrote an op-ed today in the Boston Herald explaining how earmarks are worsening our national debt.

Few things better symbolize the broken nature of Washington than the process known as “earmarking.” Earmarking is essentially a way for members of Congress to direct spending on a particular project outside the normal authorization process. One of my first votes as a U.S. senator was to support a one-year moratorium on all earmarks to send a clear signal about wasteful spending as we work to get our fiscal house in order. I was disappointed it did not pass, and have decided to voluntarily abide by the moratorium anyway.

The out-of-control spending in Washington has become a crisis and we can make a strong statement, right now, about the practice of earmarking.

We can make our voices heard and stand up against the tax and spend policies by signing this petition, right now.

By signing this petition to put a one year moratorium on earmarks, you will make a bold statement and help me continue to bang this drum in Washington.

Thanks for your support.

Scott Brown
United States Senator

P.S. Please text BROWN to 68398 if you are interested in receiving important updates on your mobile phone.


Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Sen. Scott Brown: GOP needs a truck, a barn coat, and a Cosmo center-fold to win in 2010



MA GOP Senator Scott Brown said in his speech at the GOP Convention in MA on Saturday that candidates should be themselves. No truer words will ever be spoken. Brown's success in getting elected was just that -- genuine. In meeting with the people of MA he didn't pretend to be something he wasn't or change his comments to fit who he was talking with. He was himself. He jokes, laughs, and yet is serious about issues that are facing this Country. What you see is what you get with Scott Brown and every candidate running should be the same way.

How Scott Brown handled the Cosmos centerfold speaks volumes about the man. He didn't hide it, he met the issue head on which is what all candidates should do for any issue from the past instead of trying to spin. IMHO no one should have had an issue with the centerfold, but then I still have the original Burt Reynolds centerfold in Cosmos somewhere in storage around here.

After the GOP took major hits in 2006 and 2008 in Congress, we have noticed that today's leadership in both Houses are telling it like it is which is so refreshing. They are standing up for America and what is best for the Country day in and day out and not wavering.

Time for Republicans to put an end to any candidate sticking his finger in the wind to determine what he believes that day or for that speech. If a candidate cannot be true to themselves on who they are, then don't run as we will see right through you and are in no mood for a candidate that doesn't know who they are and is not steadfast in their beliefs.

There is no better example for our candidates to follow then Scott Brown who represents the people of Massachusetts not the lobbyist. We want every Republican candidate to stand up and say this is what I believe and if you agree with me on 80% of the issues, then I am likely your candidate. That was the Ronald Reagan way and what we need today -- honesty from our Republican candidates.

Sen. Scott Brown: GOP needs a truck, a barn coat, and a Cosmo center-fold to win in 2010
By: Charlie SpieringOnline Community Manager
04/19/10 11:28 AM EDT

Sen. Scott Brown was the star of the Massachusetts Republican State Convention last weekend, and offered a 'blueprint' for victory to Republicans running for office in 2010:

Number 1: You’re going to need to buy yourself a pick-up truck. And if you’re really serious about winning – you need to get a green 2005 GMC Canyon and put 200,000 miles on it by campaigning around the state.
That’s 28,000 miles per month until Election Day, folks!

Number 2: Get yourself a barn jacket and wear it. Everywhere. Wear it all the time ...on the campaign trail, on dates with your spouse, to bed, out jogging, to church, in front of your kids’ friends. Just wear it everywhere and never take it off.

Number 3: And, I take this last one VERY seriously. Don’t be shy about pulling out those old Cosmo pictures from almost 30 years ago. That even means you, Charlie Baker!
After drawing some laughs from the crowd, Sen. Brown offered his real prescription for victory:

Seriously, the best advice I can give our candidates is, be yourself. Speak from your heart, look people in the eye, give them honest answers based on fact and without the usual political rhetoric. If you can do that, and hold fast to the principles that have built and guided our nation from the very beginning, then you will have a solid shot at winning.
Read his entire speech here:

Source: Washington Examiner

Monday, March 29, 2010

John McCain and Sarah Palin Rally in Phoenix

First Scott Brown came in to campaign for John McCain and now Sarah Palin. The heavy hitters of the Republican Party know how important it is to return John McCain to the Senate.

First is the video with Scott Brown from 6 March, 2010:




Then this past weekend, 27 March 2010, Sarah Palin was in AZ to campaign for Sen McCain:

McCain / Palin Rally Phoenix from John McCain 2010 on Vimeo


Senator Brown and former Governor Palin both recognize that it is vital to American interest to send Sen McCain back to DC. He is one of the protectors of our military along with Senator Inhofe (R-OK) and other Republicans. One thing you don't have to be concerned about with Senator McCain is ethics and honesty.

Senator McCain is one of the leaders of the fight with Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) against earmarks and pork. This election is vitally important to the future of America with the Socialists agenda by Obama and leaders in Congress they ramming through. Americans need John McCain returned to the Senate to continue fighting alongside other Sen Coburn and others to protect our Freedoms.

Last person we need in the Senate is someone like Hayworth with flawed ethics who was a big time recipient of Abramoff money, couldn't win his own Congressional seat, and is a bully by all the accounts. He couldn't keep his seat in Congress but now wants to become the AZ Senator? Give us a break! We have enough Democrats for Sale and the last thing we would need would be a big time recipient of Abramoff money on the Republican side elected to the Senate who believes in hiding the details of his association with Abramoff. Having witnessed him speaking at a State GOP function, I would tend to concur he is a bully as he went after a member of our delegation for not being conservative enough when he has a 92 lifetime average. Looks pretty conservative to me.

With Hayworth losing his seat in the House in 2006, we never did get a full accounting of Abramoff trust fund donors to Hayworth.

The Politico Mafioso asks this question on his site:

WHEN WILL JD HAYWORTH RELEASE THE NAMES OF HIS SECRET ABRAMOFF TRUST FUND DONORS?
We would also like the answer to that question. We have seen enough of someone who is not transparent with Obama, and we certainly don't need to see it out of a Republican candidate for Senate in Arizona.

Please join us in supporting Senator John McCain for the AZ Senate seat and send him back to finish the job with Dr. Coburn on earmarks and pork!

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Scott Brown's Shrewd Vote

Senators Scott Brown, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins represent Blue states where you will not find a hotbed of conservatives in most cities or towns. Scott Brown has always been about cutting taxes, smaller government, and national security. Those make him a conservative, but that doesn't mean on every issue he is going to vote like leadership wants him to vote. He represents the people of Massachusetts and as he said many times it is the people's seat.

Yesterday when this $15B jobs bill came up for a vote that 'RINO' Senator from Oklahoma Jim Inhofe voted for the bill. It should go without saying that Inhofe is anything but a RINO but yesterday I saw him called 'RINO' just like some did to Dr. Coburn (R-OK) who voted for something some conservatives didn't like.

It shows that there are some very politically naive people posting or writing for some sites as this vote yesterday was the perfect way for Scott Brown to show he was the independent vote from Massachusetts he touted during the campaign. An added benefit of the vote to invoke cloture by the three New England Senators along with the votes yesterday by even more Republicans for this bill puts a crimp in the 'Party of NO' label that the media has been gleefully touting on behalf of the Democrats. If the tax breaks in this $15B start helping business' hire, then it was worth it to vote for the bill. We honestly don't believe this version will pass the House as the House bill is filled with pork and is three times as expensive.

Brown said he reserves the right to vote 'NO' if this bill comes back laden with pork from the House. He is a fiscal conservative who doesn't believe in pork and earmarks. Would say coming out of Blue State Massachusetts, he is a gem for Republicans.

Scott Brown is what every Senator should strive to be -- the voice of the people of their state not someone to march in lockstep with Leadership. Time some conservatives woke up to the fact that one shoe doesn't fit all as the Republican Party needs people like Scott Brown representing Republicans.

Brown is a breath of fresh air on the national stage who is staying true to his word he gave when he ran for Senate. That in itself is amazing especially when you compare that to the current occupant of the White House whose speeches on the campaign trail were all rhetoric as he has done a 180 on almost everything he said.

Scott Brown's Shrewd Vote
By Andrew Cline on 2.25.10 @ 6:09AM

On Jan. 19, Scott Brown was the great right hero. On Feb 22, he became, in some quarters at least, a dirty, liberal traitor. He voted for cloture on the Senate Democrats' jobs bill, then, on Wednesday, voted for the bill.

Granted, the $15 billion jobs bill was not good legislation. "Far from perfect" was how Brown described it. The bill suspends the employer portion of the Social Security payroll tax to encourage hiring. But a tax reduction of a few hundred dollars a month will hardly encourage firms to hire employees that cost thousands per month. It also pumps billions into more federal transportation projects, which, as last year's failed stimulus bill showed, is no way to help the economy. Still, Brown's vote for the bill was a good move for him and ultimately for conservatives.

Conservative activists are the first people to attack Democratic members of Congress for "voting in lock step with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid." It is a valid criticism, especially as applied to Democrats from more moderate states, such as Louisiana or New Hampshire. So maybe those same activists should stop and think for a moment about the political ramifications of pressuring Scott Brown to vote in lock step with Mitch McConnell.

Scott Brown does not represent the Republican National Committee in the United States Senate. He represents Massachusetts. That's by the Founders' design, and it is a good one. If Scott Brown voted as though he were from Alabama, the voters of Massachusetts would, at the first available opportunity, send him there. Where would the conservative movement be then?

Part of the problem here is the way we think about partisan politics. We say things like, "the Republicans control 41 Senate seats." No, they don't. Nor should they. There is a huge difference between Republicans having a member of their party elected to the Senate from Massachusetts, and Republicans controlling a Senate seat from Massachusetts. It would be a sad day for the republic if party bosses completely controlled the votes of their members. If that were the case, we would already be living under Obamacare and cap-and-trade. Thank goodness for moderate Democrats who represented the people back home instead of the party bosses on those votes. And thank goodness for Scott Brown, who got elected by promising to be an independent vote in Washington and, in his first month at least, is living up to that promise.

But what about the bill? It's bad legislation, so how can Brown's vote for it be good? Here is how:

Critics of Brown's vote haven't been listening to what he's been saying. During the election campaign, Brown was asked where he fit on the Republican political spectrum. He identified himself as "a Massachusetts Republican." In an interview with FrumForum, he said, "I'm the closest thing [Bay Staters] will get to a Reagan Democrat." He also said, "I've always been an independent voter, and when I have to cross party lines, I do. I don't usually care what my party says."

Brown made clear from the start that he would not vote as a movement conservative or a leadership lapdog. He'd go his own way, regardless of where the leadership or the GOP base tried to drag him. And that's a good thing. He is, after all, from Massachusetts, remember?

With the jobs bill -- his first major vote -- Brown established his Washington identity. He proclaimed himself an independent-minded Republican who will oppose party leaders and work with Democrats. In Massachusetts, that is the only way he survives politically.

He also kept two important campaign promises: 1) that he will be independent of his party, and 2) that he would vote for legislation to create jobs. Now, policy wonks know that this jobs bill is ill-suited to job creation and better alternatives exist. But listen to Brown's explanation: "I supported this measure because it does contain some tax relief that will help Massachusetts businesses put people back to work."

Brown has signaled to his constituents that he voted for tax cuts, just as he promised in the campaign. He is from Massachusetts. That's huge.

Excerpt: Read More at American Spectator

Friday, February 5, 2010

Brown hits back at Kennedy for ‘joke’ candidacy dig


U.S. Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) (L) talks with Rep. Patrick Kennedy
last week following his election to the seat Sen. Edward M. Kennedy,
Patrick Kennedy’s father, once held.

Some things never change and Patrick Kennedy being a jerk is one of those. Hope that the voters of Rhode Island ousts him from the House of Representatives. What a petty thing to have Patrick Kennedy call Senator Brown's candidacy "a joke" when in reality the joke has been Patrick Kennedy representing Rhode Island.

Between Patrick Kennedy and the office staff of Kennedy/Kirk and their whine about having to move before they wanted to move out of the office shows a lack of class on the part of some Democrats.

Brown hits back at Kennedy for ‘joke’ candidacy dig
By Jessica Van Sack
Friday, February 5, 2010

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A stung U.S. Sen. Scott Brown lashed out at U.S. Rep. Patrick Kennedy today for insulting his landmark win by calling his candidacy “a joke.”
Brown said Kennedy’s remarks are “mean-spirited,” especially coming on the day he was celebrating being sworn into office.

“I was elected and the votes are certified and I’m here to do my job. It’s unfortunate that he would use mean-spirited comments like that at a time when we’re just trying to solve the problems of the Commonwealth,” Brown said today on his first full day on the job.

Kennedy (D-R.I.) told The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room yesterday, “Brown’s whole candidacy was shown to be a joke today when he was sworn in early in order to cast his first vote as an objection to Obama’s appointment to the NLRB.”

The son of former U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, whose seat Brown is now filling, added that the newly confirmed GOP senator is a key vote against the nomination of union lawyer Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

“This is where he shows that when they need him, he’s in the tank for the Republicans,” Kennedy is quoted as saying.

Brown has denied any hidden agenda in moving up his swearing-in from Feb. 11 to yesterday afternoon.

A procedural vote on whether to confirm President Obama’s pick for the NLRB is scheduled for Monday and is expected to provide the first test of whether the Republicans’ new 41-member caucus can sustain a filibuster - and will be among the first votes cast by Brown.

Excerpt: Read More at Boston Herald

Thursday, February 4, 2010

DONATELLI: The GOP after Massachusetts

We agree with most of the article except for bi-partisan healthcare for this year. The only way Republicans are going to get a seat at that table is to oust the Democrats and Pelosi from House Leadership in November. The Senate is not much better.

It would be virtually impossible to get Tort Reform with Pelosi and her crew and without Tort Reform any healthcare needs to be DOA. You also need a bill where Pharmaceutical Companies didn't cut a deal with the President. Until this Congress goes back to basics on a Healthcare bill, the current House and Senate ones need to die and not be resurrected in any way shape or form.

We agree wholeheartedly that the most important issues are what Scott Brown talked about todayy -- cut Federal spending, cut taxes, and national security. Those are three issues every Republican in this Country should be running on for the House and Senate. We need to paint the Country bright red come November 2, 2010.

DONATELLI: The GOP after Massachusetts
Feb 4, 2010

By Frank Donatelli

Scott Brown's historic win in Massachusetts scrambles the politi -cal picture for both parties. For Demo-crats, it means they will have far more dif- ficulty turning their momentary supermajority into a permanently larger federal establishment. For Republicans, it gives them a toehold on power in Washington, a seat at the policy table and an even greater opportunity to make real gains in the 2010 midterm elections.

The Republican Party needs to move on five main things right now.

First, the party needs to do everything possible to defeat Obamacare. More than anything, this was the signature issue that gave rocket fuel to the Brown campaign. (snip)

Second, after the bill is defeated, Republicans should seek to engage the administration on true reform of the system that focuses on cost containment. Measures for discussion must include tort reform, enhanced health savings accounts and creating more vibrant markets and competition for individuals to purchase their own health plans. (snip)

Third, the party should move to limit the uncertainty that surrounds business decisions by the private sector. How can firms possibly make decisions about expansion and new hiring if they have no idea about future costs of labor, energy and health care? (snip)

Fourth, Republicans need to engage the administration on real job-creation measures. The recovery is under way, but unemployment is still at 10 percent and it shows no sign of decreasing anytime soon. Part of the solution is to remove uncertainty in the marketplace for businesses, and a second step is to create tax incentives for businesses to expand payrolls. Past stimulus bills focused on temporary government jobs, not creation of permanent private-sector jobs. (snip)

Fifth, the party must step up efforts to recruit the best candidates to challenge Democrats, everywhere. If Massachusetts can be won, so can every other state, including Wisconsin, Oregon and Maryland, where the party is still seeking top challengers. Strong Republican candidates are also needed in a number of congressional districts that were won by President Bush and Sen. John McCain in the last two presidential elections. (snip)

Frank Donatelli is chairman of GOPAC, a center for training and electing the next generation of Republican leaders.

Excerpt: Read More as Washington Times

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Senator-Elect Scott Brown to be Sworn in Feb 4, 2010

This is great news as Majority Leader Reid and others Dems have been pushing through legislation that the Acting Senator Kirk from MA should not have been voting on but far be it from the Democrats to play fair. We are extremely happy to see Senator-Elect Brown take the necessary steps to take the oath tomorrow. We find it almost comical for the Democrats including the MA Governor and Reid to say they had no problem and were planning to do it anyone because we don't believe that for a second.

We are still waiting to find out how the MA Rep was seated (2 days) compared to Brown, but we are not going to hold our breath.

Congratulations Senator Brown as tomorrow is going to be a huge day for Republicans when the Democrats no longer have a 60-vote margin and will have to listen to Republican ideas for a change if they want to get any legislation past.



Brown pushes for swearing-in tomorrow (Feb 4, 2010)
By Hillary Chabot
Wednesday, February 3, 2010 - Updated 3h ago

U.S. Sen.-elect Scott Brown has demanded his official swearing-in ceremony be pushed up to tomorrow afternoon saying there are upcoming vital votes in Congress – and the governor’s office said today he’ll get his wish.

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) also tells the Herald there should be no issue with seating Brown tomorrow.

“He was the one who suggested Feb. 11, but if he has certified papers there’s no reason he can’t be sworn in tomorrow,” said Jim Manley, Reid’s spokesman.

Brown sent a letter through campaign lawyer Daniel Winslow asking Gov. Deval Patrick sign his election results by 11 a.m. tomorrow. Patrick had already planned to sign the paperwork at 9:30 a.m., his staff tells the Herald.

“While Sen.-elect Brown had tentatively planned to be sworn into office on Feb. 11, he has been advised that there are a number of votes scheduled prior to that date,” Winslow wrote in the letter. “For that reason, he wants certification to occur immediately. As he is a duly elected U.S. Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts he is entitled to be seated now.”

The letter did not detail which key votes Brown wants to weigh in on, but there will be a controversial vote to confirm pro-union candidate Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board.

“We request results be certified without delay ... so we may deliver an original by hand to Secretary of the US Senate in time to allow Sen-elect Brown to be administered the oath of office by Vice President (Joseph Biden) tomorrow afternoon.”

In an interview with the Herald last week, Brown has said he would like to start work immediately but was fine with the Feb. 11 date because Senate leadership had been promised work on health care reform wouldn’t go forward.

Brown has been waiting to be seated for nearly a month while U.S Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-Lowell) was sworn in 48 hours after she was elected in 2007.

Brown spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said the Feb. 11 swearing-in date was a tentative target for planning purposes.

“Since the election results are now complete, there’s no reason to wait. Senator-elect Brown wants to take his seat and participate in the votes that are coming up,” he said. “There are votes coming up on nominees for GSA administrator, Solicitor of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board.”

Excerpt: Read more at Boston Herald