I think it’s a little -- as Mark Twain said, rumors of my demise may be a little exaggerated at this point. President Obama, 30 Apr 2013, Press Conference
After reading on various sites some real negatives about the President's Press Conference today, I decided to go check for myself. Seems some of the comments were taken out of context which should be no surprise from this White House Press Corps. IMHO, the WH Press Corps needs new blood and those that have been there for as long as most of can remember, need to find a new job. WH Press Corps started complaining about President Bush going to Crawford as they had to stay in Waco. Since those days, they seem to complain more and ask dumber questions trying to do a gotcha. Just give us the facts and skip the biased reporting.
This question by Jonathan Karl left me with what kind of question is this since Karl seems to be blaming the President instead of Congress for lack of progress on getting things done. Is Karl that out in left field to not know the President cannot do a thing if the obstructionists Republicans say no. Would he have asked the same question of Bill Clinton?
Karl brought up the FAA controllers which I think was a good bill to pass so the FAA can move money more for safety then anything. Many forget that a good deal of the military airports hand over tower duties in the evening to local large airports so the towers pick up even more workload. They were mostly fine for a week but if had drug on, how many near misses would have happened? Thought this comeback to Karl was priceless since he seemed to have a problem figuring out that Congress does have responsibilities and it is not President Obama's place to get them to act.
But, Jonathon, you seem to suggest that somehow these folks over there have no responsibilities and that my job is to somehow get them to behave. That’s their job. They’re elected -- members of Congress are elected in order to do what’s right for their constituencies and for the American people.
Today's Republicans in Congress are the worst I have ever seen and to even hint any Democrat can get them to move on anything is ludicrous. It takes their constituents being up in arms and even then like we saw on background checks for guns, we got ignored by Senate Republicans for the most part. A lot of them only listen to their big donors on how to vote.
Jonathan Karl.
Q Mr. President, you are a hundred days into your second term. On the
gun bill, you put, it seems, everything into it to try to get it passed.
Obviously, it didn’t. Congress has ignored your efforts to try to get them to
undo these sequester cuts. There’s even a bill that you threatened to veto that
got 92 Democrats in the House voting yes. So my question to you is do you still
have the juice to get the rest of your agenda through this Congress?
THE PRESIDENT: If you put it that way, Jonathan -- (laughter) -- maybe I
should just pack up and go home. Golly.
I think it’s a little -- as Mark Twain said, rumors of my demise may be a
little exaggerated at this point.
We understand that we’re in a divided government right now. The Republicans
control the House of Representatives. In the Senate, this habit of requiring 60
votes for even the most modest piece of legislation has gummed up the works
there. And I think it comes as no surprise not even to the American people, but
even members of Congress themselves that right now things are pretty
dysfunctional up on Capitol Hill.
Despite that, I’m actually confident that there are a range of things that
we’re going to be able to get done. I feel confident that the bipartisan work
that’s been done on immigration reform will result in a bill that passes the
Senate, passes the House, and gets on my desk. And that’s going to be a
historic achievement. And I’ve been very complimentary of the efforts of both
Republicans and Democrats in those efforts.
It is true that the sequester is in place right now. It’s damaging our
economy. It’s hurting our people. And we need to lift it. What’s clear is, is
that the only way we’re going to lift it is if we do a bigger deal that meets
the test of lowering our deficit and growing our economy at the same time. And
that’s going to require some compromises on the part of both Democrats and
Republicans.
I’ve had some good conversations with Republican senators so far. Those
conversations are continuing. I think there’s a genuine desire on many of their
parts to move past not only sequester but Washington dysfunction. Whether we
can get it done or not, we’ll see.
But I think the sequester is a good example -- or this recent FAA issue is
a good example. You will recall that even as recently as my campaign,
Republicans we’re saying, sequester is terrible, this is a disaster, it’s going
to ruin our military, it’s going to be disastrous for the economy -- we've got
to do something about it. Then, when it was determined that doing something
about it might mean that we close some tax loopholes for the wealthy and the
well-connected, suddenly, well, you know what, we’ll take the sequester. And
the notion was somehow that we had exaggerated the effects of the sequester --
remember? The President is crying wolf. He’s Chicken Little. The sequester --
no problem.
And then in rapid succession, suddenly White House tours -- this is
terrible! How can we let that happen? Meat inspectors -- we’ve got to fix
that. And, most recently, what are we going to do about potential delays at
airports?
So despite the fact that a lot of members of Congress were suggesting that
somehow the sequester was a victory for them and this wouldn’t hurt the economy,
what we now know is what I warned earlier, what Jay stood up here and warned
repeatedly, is happening. It’s slowed our growth. It’s resulting in people
being thrown out of work. And it’s hurting folks all across the country.
And the fact that Congress responded to the short-term problem of flight
delays by giving us the option of shifting money that’s designed to repair and
improve airports over the long term to fix the short-term problem -- well,
that’s not a solution. And essentially what we’ve done is we’ve said, in order
to avoid delays this summer, we’re going to ensure delays for the next two or
three decades.
Q Why’d you go along with it?
THE PRESIDENT: Hold on a second.
So the alternative, of course, is either to go ahead and impose a whole
bunch of delays on passengers now -- which also does not fix the problem -- or
the third alternative is to actually fix the problem by coming up with a
broader, larger deal.
But, Jonathon, you seem to suggest that somehow these folks over there have
no responsibilities and that my job is to somehow get them to behave. That’s
their job. They’re elected -- members of Congress are elected in order to do
what’s right for their constituencies and for the American people.
So if, in fact, they are seriously concerned about passenger convenience
and safety, then they shouldn’t just be thinking about tomorrow or next week or
the week after that; they should be thinking about what’s going to happen five
years from now, 10 years from now, or 15 years from now. The only way to do
that is for them to engage with me on coming up with a broader deal. And that’s
exactly what I’m trying to do -- is to continue to talk to them about are there
ways for us to fix this.
Frankly, I don’t think that if I were to veto, for example, this FAA bill,
that that somehow would lead to the broader fix. It just means that there would
be pain now, which they would try to blame on me, as opposed to pain five years
from now. But either way, the problem is not getting fixed.
The only way the problem does get fixed is if both parties sit down and
they say: How are we going to make sure that we're reducing our deficit
sensibly? How are we making sure that we're investing in things like rebuilding
our airports and our roads and our bridges, and investing in early childhood
education, basic research -- all the things that are going to help us grow? And
that's what the American people want.
Just one interesting statistic when it comes to airports. There was a
recent survey of the top airports in the country -- in the world, and there was
not a single U.S. airport that came in the top 25. Not one. Not one U.S.
airport was considered by the experts and consumers who use these airports to be
in the top 25 in the world. I think Cincinnati Airport came in around
30th.
What does that say about our long-term competitiveness and future? And so
when folks say, well, there was some money in the FAA to deal with these
furloughs -- well, yeah, the money is this pool of funds that are supposed to
try to upgrade our airports so we don't rank in the bottom of industrialized
countries when it comes to our infrastructure.
And that's what we're doing -- we're using our seed corn short term. And
the only reason we're doing it is because right now we've got folks who are
unwilling to make some simple changes to our tax code, for example, to close
loopholes that aren't adding to our competitiveness and aren't helping
middle-class families.
So that's a long way of answering your question, but the point is that
there are common-sense solutions to our problems right now. I cannot force
Republicans to embrace those common-sense solutions. I can urge them to. I can
put pressure on them. I can rally the American people around those common-sense
solutions. But ultimately, they, themselves, are going to have to say, we want
to do the right thing.
And I think there are members certainly in the Senate right now, and I
suspect members in the House as well, who understand that deep down. But
they're worried about their politics. It’s tough. Their base thinks that
compromise with me is somehow a betrayal. They’re worried about primaries. And
I understand all that. And we're going to try to do everything we can to create
a permission structure for them to be able to do what’s going to be best for the
country. But it’s going to take some time.
The last sentence tells it like it is - Republicans are scared of being primaried from the hard right if they compromise with Obama. When are they going to grow a spine and decide to do what is best for the Country instead of a bunch of extremists who have taken over the Party. Do none of the GOP today have a spine to tell this group of malcontents to go jump? Doesn't look House Republicans are going to agree to much of anything as they have thrown Government into chaos with their 'my way or no way' governing.
One solution is to vote out the GOP obstructionists in 2014 so Government can start to work again. The vast majority of Republicans in the House and some in the Senate seem to have forgotten why they were sent to Congress as they represent all their constituents not just the hard right. When get reelected is put ahead of the American people, it is time for them to retire and find another line of work.
