Showing posts with label Obstructionists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obstructionists. Show all posts

Monday, April 22, 2013

NRA Spent $28M in 2012 Elections to Buy Candidates and Office Holders - It Worked

NRA puppetmasters pulled the strings of their bought and paid for Senators while 90% of American people were told our voices don't count!

So much happened last week that I wasn't sure where to start but this editorial from the Tampa Bay Times on the Senate vote on gun control background checks became even more important after the bombings in Boston. The guns obtained by the Boston bombers were obtained illegally.  The older brother was not an American citizen and had a history of domestic violence.  He was interviewed by the FBI several years ago at the request of Russia who was concerned about his activities.  That should have been in a registry for background checks but since we don't have background checks for private sales at gun shows, any terrorists or criminal can walk in and buy a gun.  The younger brother was too young to have a permit to buy a gun in MA.  From accounts this morning, the younger brother is answering questions via pen and pencil, since he was shot in the throat.  Hopefully he will give them the answers as to why this happened in Boston and what was planned in the future because of the large number of explosives and weapons cache that was found.  

Wonder how the members of the Senate who voted against the background check or illegal trafficking amendments feel today?  Republican members of the Senate lied to the American people on what was in the background check bill.  There was no established registry but that didn't stop them from going out telling people that is why they voted against the bill. Tampa Bay Times nails the members of the Senate including four Democrats Baucus (MT), Begich (AK), Heitcamp (ND), and Pryor (AR) who voted against background checks. Majority Reid voted NO in order to bring the bill back to the floor.
Editorial: How soon they forget
Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:57pm (video will play after ad)
On another Friday morning just four months ago, these 20 first-graders were murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. 
And these six educators died trying to protect them. 
This week, 45 senators forgot those faces and ignored our voices. They voted against expanding background checks for gun buyers.
By the numbers
3,513 people have been killed by guns since Sandy Hook.
91 percent of Americans favor expanded background checks for gun buyers.
91 percent of Florida voters favor expanded background checks for gun buyers.
$21 million was spent in the 2012 election cycle on federal elections by the National Rifle Association.
Here are the common sense amendments that were voted against on gun control with only one exception which was passed to protect privacy:

0010418-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 717 Agreed to Barrasso Amdt. No. 717; To withhold 5 percent of Community Oriented Policing Services program Federal funding from States and local governments that release sensitive and confidential information on law-abiding gun owners and victims of domestic violence.
0010317-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 714 Rejected Lautenberg Amdt. No. 714; To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.
0010217-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 720 Rejected Burr Amdt. No. 720; To protect the Second Amendment rights of veterans and their families.
0010117-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 711 Rejected Feinstein Amdt. No. 711; To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.
0010017-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 719 Rejected Cornyn Amdt. No. 719; To allow reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms.
0009917-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 713 Rejected Leahy Amdt. No. 713; To increase public safety by punishing and deterring firearms trafficking.
0009817-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 725 Rejected Grassley Amdt. No. 725; To address gun violence, improve the availability of records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, address mental illness in the criminal justice system, and end straw purchases and trafficking of illegal firearms, and for other purposes.
0009717-Apr S. 649 On the Amendment S.Amdt. 715 Rejected Manchin Amdt. No. 715; To protect Second Amendment rights, ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, and provide a responsible and consistent background check process.

Once you start looking at the amendments that were rejected, you start asking yourself why the minority is running the Senate when you cannot even pass common sense gun control amendments in light of all the shootings that are happening.  Trigger locks are used to make a firearm more difficult to discharge and act as a safety precaution in carrying and owning guns. However, only nine states in America (NY, NJ, CA, OH, MI, RI, MD, PA, MA) have trigger lock laws that enforce this precautionary measure.  Why isn't this mandatory in every state?

We have seen way too many young children get their hands on guns and shoot someone else or themselves when a loaded gun has been left in reach of a child.  IMHO that should be child endangerment, but not in the world of the NRA where they believe young children should be taught to use guns.  Young children are not capable of understanding the power of guns but that doesn't stop the NRA from wanting to arm them. In Missouri a State Senator bill would require schools to teach the NRA's Eddie Eagle Gun Safe Program or a similar program to all first-graders.  I wouldn't want the NRA propaganda machine anywhere near young children today.  They are nothing but lobbyists for the gun/ammo manufactures to sell more guns.

Majority Leader Harry Reid as I have stated many times was dumb to have cut a deal with Mitch McConnell on filibusters which require a 60-vote margin to pass and has put the Senate at a standstill. The American people demand more out of their Congress then we are getting. These obstructionists tactics are driving more and more Republicans to become Independents, Democrats, or Republicans supporting all Democrats in 2014.

This bunch of NRA bought and paid for Republicans would even vote for the Leahy Amendment No. 713; To increase public safety by punishing and deterring firearms trafficking.  In essence the vast majority of Republicans came down on the side of criminals and terrorists.  Is that what they want their legacy to be?  That bill lost 58-42 with Republicans Collins (ME), Murkowski (AK), and Kirk (IL) voting for the Leahy amendment and these 42 Republicans voting against:
NAYs ---42
Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Lee (R-UT)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

If that wasn't enough, you have the classless Minority Leader Mitch McConnell coming out with this graphic on his Facebook page which did not play well. In fact it received the same reaction as Rand Paul saying that the Newtown people were being used as props by President Obama. The vast majority of American people are disgusted with both of their reactions which were classless.

  
NO one is coming to take any guns away from law abiding citizens no matter how many times the NRA and Republicans play that card. The fight is far from over and those of us who want some common sense gun control are not going away. We are also not forgetting who voted for the criminals and terrorists to be able to obtain guns from private individuals. Have often wondered how many of these private sellers are people who refuse to get a gun dealers license so they can keep selling to whoever will pay the highest in order to obtain guns with no background check or ID required. IMHO, all dealers at gun shows should have to be licensed.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

GOP Senators Paul, Lee, Cruz, and Rubio Want to Filibuster Any Gun Bills Before Any Debate

No debate necessary on gun control - the four member governing body of GOP Senators have spoken.

Republicans in the Senate are at it again - now want to filibuster Gun Reforms before bill is even debated on the floor of the Senate.  Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), Ted Cruz (R-TX), and Marco Rubio (R-FL) are part of what is wrong in the Senate as they have the attitude as the minority they can just filibuster what they do not want as it makes no difference as long as debate and vote is stopped.  The problem is that it is not one or two issues but almost everything a few hard right Senators decide doesn't need to come to the floor.

Majority Leader Reid should NOT have made a deal with Minority Leader McConnell on filibusters because within days the GOP started abusing filibusters again and McConnell set back and did nothing.  You cannot trust today's Republican males in the Senate not to make utter fools of themselves as they seek to stop bills.  Over 90% of the American people want tightened background checks and the four stooges don't even want a vote.  Must be getting heavy donations to their campaigns from the NRA.  Am sick and tired of Republican Senator and House members  putting big donors over the Country.  This bunch of Republicans in Congress for the most part cannot be trusted as evidenced by what we are seeing on Gun Reform.  There are some Dems in the same category in the Senate who want nothing to do with gun control - afraid of reelection?  How about if both sides work for the American people not the NRA?
Reid’s Office Denounces ‘Outrageous’ GOP Filibuster Threat On Gun Reforms

 
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-NV) office on Thursday lambasted a threat by a handful of Republican senators to filibuster gun legislation, after President Obama urged Congress to act in a televised speech. 
"While this threat is entirely unsurprising, it's outrageous that these senators are unwilling to even engage in a debate over gun violence in America," Reid's spokesman Adam Jentleson said in a statement to TPM. "No matter your opinion on this issue, we should all be able to agree with President Obama when he said that the children and teachers of Newtown, along with all other Americans who have been victims of gun violence, at least deserve a vote." 
The threat to vote against a motion to begin debating the bill was made in a letter by Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT) and Ted Cruz (R-TX), which was cosigned by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) on Thursday.
With parents who lost children to gun violence along with some of their teachers standing behind the President Obama, he is once again pushing Congress for action on gun control measures -- are they listening?

President Obama: We Have Not Forgotten What Happened in Newtown


Today, President Obama promised the American people that he had not forgotten the 20 innocent chidlren and six brave educators who lost their lives at Sandy Hook Elementary more than 100 days ago. Standing with parents and teachers of gun violence victims, he urged Congress to take action that will protect other children and families from the pain and grief these families have experienced. 
“As I said when I visited Newtown just over three months ago, if there is a step we can take that will save just one child, just one parent, just another town from experiencing the same grief that some of the moms and dads who are here have endured, then we should be doing it,” President Obama said. “We have an obligation to try.” 
In January, the President put forward a series of common-sense proposals to reduce the epidemic of gun violence and keep our kids safe, and in his State of the Union address, the President called on Congress to give these proposals a vote.  “And in just a couple of weeks, they will,” he said.
Excerpt:  Read More at White House website
No one is coming to take anyone's legitimate guns away from them but you would never know it from the hysterics from the NRA and those on the right.  Have never understood why increasing background checks to include all guns sold at gun shows is wrong.  Don't get the mentality of today's gun crowd which is nothing like my Dad when he owned guns to hunt animals not people.  IMHO I still think parents who leave a loaded gun around their house that a child gets access and kills themselves or someone else should be charged with child endangerment.  Put that on a website and see attacks start.  If your child is not in the proper car seat and dies in a wreck, you are held responsible so why not with guns.

Please contact your members of Congress and tell them to support reasonable gun control laws and to stop any idea of a filibuster in the Senate.  Tired of grand standers and this is what these Senators are doing with two of them Paul and Rubio hoping to run for President.  Not getting my vote but then my votes for the GOP are not happening with the crazy GOP of today.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Senate and House Republicans Refuse to Face the Fact they Lost in 2012 as Their Obstruction Continues


Group of small minded Congressional Republicans today who since they didn't win in 2014 they want to take the ball that belongs to their opponents and go home.

As I was going through my email this morning, I found the link to this article from Politicususa by RMuse, Making It Up As They Go Along, Republicans Use Fantasies To Block Obama Nominees which I have excerpted.  All of a sudden it is beginning to make sense.  In the Senate the GOP is using the power of the new style filibuster to make it difficult on President Obama to put his team together.  Maybe if he had a full cabinet and heads of agencies like ATF, the GOP wouldn't be able to be so obstructive as the Obama Administration would have more voices to speak to the American people.

The very idea that Republican Senators don't think President Obama has the right to pick members of his Cabinet and Administration goes against everything we have been taught over the years that the Senate will only hold up really bad nominations like Harriet Miers, the Bush nominee for SCOTUS, which both parties tabled.  The attacks on Obama nominees are so far over the top that I have a hard time believing that Republicans in good conscience can even bring up the lies to keep someone from getting confirmed when they know it is false like "Friends of Hamas" which Cruz (R-TX) and Inhofe (R-OK) used as part of their attacks on Secretary of Defense Hagel.  Group of small minded Congressional Republicans today who since they didn't win in 2014 they want to take the ball that belongs to their opponents and go home.

Find these tactics out of Republicans in Congress reprehensible and is not why they were elected by voters to go to the Congress.  This group of Republicans continue to put wealthy donors and party over what it good for the Country and all Americans not just a privileged few.  The longer this is going on, the more Republicans I know who are saying we are supporting Democrats in 2014 and 2016 because this Country cannot take another Republican President until it gets back on its feet completely if ever.
Throughout the President’s tenure, Republicans have raised false concerns about every nominee and judicial appointment to the point that instead of listing the nominees and appointees they have obstructed, it is easier to cite those they did not obstruct; John Kerry. Kerry was easily confirmed without objection because Republican chose him to be Secretary of State, and as long as this President allows Republicans to run the government and choose who serves in high-level positions, the confirmation process moves quickly through the Senate. 
Typically and historically, the duly-elected President gets to choose his own cabinet members, department heads, and federal judges, but this is the 21st century, and either Senate Republicans decide who serves in government from their minority position, or they will block, place holds, and obstruct nominees and appointees regardless the Constitution or results of two elections. 
Over the course of the past two-and-a-half months, Republicans have used Benghazi, drones, and now a levee and lone African American with a beret to hold up the President’s nominees to serve as Secretary of Defense, CIA director, Labor Secretary, and head of the EPA for no other reason than obstructing the President and the government. It is no small coincidence that every single high-profile position in the President’s administration has been blocked, held, obstructed, or warrants a special investigation by Republicans in the Senate, and it is not because they are radical extremists or pose an existential threat to America, but because Republicans have to block the President to prevent the government from operating and serving the people. 
It is time to cite the real problem, and reason, Washington is dysfunctional and government is ineffective, and it is not poor personnel choices by the President, it is Republicans refusal to accept the results of two elections coupled with their belief that they control the African American in the Oval Office and run the government, and if he fails to comply, they will block and obstruct. The problem is not isolated to Senate Republicans either, because House Republicans refuse to allow a vote on any matter that does not eliminate anti-poverty programs, slash domestic spending, kill jobs, or raise much-needed revenue to run the government, but they will push entitlements for the rich and impose religious edicts on women and gays with ferocity and single-minded determination. 
Republicans have distinguished themselves as the most ineffectual Congress in a century, if not in America’s history, through their obstructionism and inability to govern, or serve the people who elected them. They have, though, managed to say no, block, and attempted to prevent anyone from governing effectively, and used their deviance to find absurd reasons to keep government from working. As incompetent and worthless as congressional Republicans have been over the past four years, at least they are efficacious at something, but saying no, blocking progress, and obstruction for obstruction’s sake is not why they were sent to Washington. The media, Democrats, and especially President Obama need to tell the American people why government is not working, but only if Republicans give them permission to speak without citing deficit reduction and entitlement reform.
Seems Congressional Republicans are okay with spending money like a drunken sailor when they have a Republican President but when it is a Democrat especially a black Democrat, they have a real problem and refuse to face reality or to listen to most of their constituents preferring to listen only to the hard right.  This has created a bubble like I have never witnessed where these obstructionist Republicans feel perfectly free to go against the wishes of the majority of Americans on issues like gun control, sequestration, budget, job bills especially for veterans, or aid for farmers still hurting from the drought which were left to flounder in the House until they went in the trash can when the new Congress took over.

Problem in the Senate is that Majority Leader Harry Reid, (D-NV) seems too weak to handle being Majority Leader cutting deals with GOP Minority Leader McConnell which is like trying to feed an alligator with your bare hand - going to get bit off every time.  It takes outrage from voters across America to give Senator Reid a backbone on gun control measures like the Assault Weapons Ban which will be brought up for a vote in a few weeks after originally saying he doesn't have the votes.  Need to keep the pressure on to make sure Senator Reid keeps his backbone and cuts NO more deals with Republicans.

From Rolling Stone
After watching voters punish the GOP in the 2012 elections, Republican elites have been talking a brave game about reforms that would make the party less repulsive to Latinos, women and gay-friendly millennials. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, the GOP's hip-hop-quoting young standard-bearer, is pressing conservatives to back an amnesty for undocumented immigrants. Dozens of party stalwarts, headlined by former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, renounced their opposition to gay marriage in a Supreme Court brief. GOP bigwigs have even launched New Republican – a group modeled after Bill Clinton's centrist Democratic Leadership Council – which seeks to rebrand the party as "colorblind," "not anti-government" and dedicated to "ending corporate welfare." 
How the GOP Became the Party of the Rich 
Don't be fooled. On the ground, a very different reality is unfolding: In the Republican-led Congress, GOP-dominated statehouses and even before the nation's highest court, the reactionary impulses of the Republican Party appear unbowed. Across the nation, the GOP's severely conservative agenda – which seeks to impose job-killing austerity, to roll back voting and reproductive rights, to deprive the working poor of health care, and to destroy agencies that protect the environment from industry and consumers from predatory banks – is moving forward under full steam. 
The hardcore rump of the party is even working to punish moderate outliers like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie – the party's most popular leader – who was denied a speaking role at the conservative movement's annual convention, CPAC. Today's GOP may desperately need to remake itself as "culturally modern, environmentally responsible and economically inclusive," argues David Frum, a veteran of the George W. Bush White House, but it remains, he says, in the throes of a "Tea Party tantrum." 
As it works to lock in as many retrograde policies as possible before it finally chooses to either modernize or die, the Republican Party is like a wounded beast: Rarely has it been more dangerous.
Finally dawned on me why it became easy to support President Obama after being on the other side - he reminds me of President Eisenhower and the way he governed.  Ike didn't believe in the huge defense/industrial complex and warned the Country that it could be a huge problem in the future which has turned out to be 100% right.  He believed everyone had the same rights to an education when he integrated schools in Arkansas.  Ike was my Dad's hero and turned into mine - read every book I could find on Ike and then used for book reports to the stage by English teacher asked if I could ready other types of books.  Turns out that Ike is turning out to be the last Republican President who truly understood what was best for all Americans.
Progressive ideas of today are similar to Republican Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, Teddy Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln
Ike is also why my premise that Republicans want to return to the 50's is wrong as today's hard right Republican Party doesn't like President Eisenhower - too much of a progressive.  Received my "I like IKE" bumper strip in the mail which is sitting on my desk -- thinking of putting it on my car to irritate the hard right in my state.  Will take warmer weather but about 95% sure, it is going to end up on my car.
In the Tea Party narrative, president Obama is a reckless socialist spending America into oblivion. In reality, the president has governed like an old-school Republican. Despite having taken heroic measures to rescue the economy in 2009, Obama has presided over the slowest expansion of federal spending since Eisenhower – and repeatedly offered to help Republicans slash the social safety net as part of a "grand bargain" that would restore the nation to fiscal balance. 
Thanks to a rebounding tax base and the nearly $1 trillion in budget cuts that both parties agreed to in the first phase of the debt-ceiling deal, the deficit, entering 2013, was shrinking at a faster clip than at any time since the peace dividend after WWII. Federal outlays on both guns and butter were on a path to hit postwar lows as a percentage of gross domestic product by the end of Obama's second term.
Anyone who believes what the RNC Chair Priebus and other Republicans are peddling about an outreach need to understand this is for media consumption only as they have no intention of changing their policies or making the GOP inclusive as long as the hard right and donors like Koch Brothers run the Party.  As soon as Priebus came out with his $10M plan to better get out their message, I laughed.  It is their message that is out of touch and delivering that message to more voters will help the Democrats.

Democrats would be in better shape if they had better party organizations in Red States where they are not all that competitive even though they outnumber Republicans.  State Democrat Parties need an infusion of a backbone like the one Reid needs.  It is almost like they ask Republicans if it is okay to do something in the states and don't seem to be able to strike back very well.

The new Organizing for Action (OfA) that grew out of the Obama campaign's Organizing for America is a whole different story and believe they are the future of Democrat wins even in the Red States.  They are organized, have people from all walks of life, welcome all Americans to help, and have one of the best GOTV operations I have ever seen.  On Twitter a new group which supports OfA, Unite Blue, is doing the same thing with bringing people together to support Democrat candidates in 2014 and 2016.

Time to join the efforts of Americans across the Country who want obstructionists ousted from the Congress as they are not listening to "We the People" but a small group of wealthy donors and supporters from the hard right.  Time to move American forward not backward like members of the Republican Party want to do to women in particular with their wanting to return to the back alley abortions after restricting birth control.  Neanderthals had more brains then this group of anti-women hating men of today's Republican Party.

The future looks bright for America if we can defeat the Obstructionists in the House in 2014 and keep the Senate but it is going to take hard work to oust some of those House Members who are in gerrymandered 'safe' House seats.  Those so-called safe seats do not take into consideration how mad a lot of Republicans are at today's GOP.  We will be helping Democrat candidates oust the obstructionist in 2014 and see where it goes from there.  Don't think it is going to change as the hard right shift of the GOP doesn't look to be ending.  For many of us who used to vote and support Republican candidates, putting the Country first while turning our backs on Republicans has been an easier process then we could have ever imagined.  That tells me the GOP I knew no longer exists with the hard right shift.

Progressive ideas of today are similar to Republican Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, Teddy Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln.  Just call me a progressive today following the lead of those three great Republican Presidents.